🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in graves vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should stop but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.